What Will Happen to the Heavily Tatted Women?

What Will Happen to the Heavily Tatted Women?

The Major was on vacation for the week. As he sat on a Caribbean beach, he noticed several Western women that were heavily tatted. By “tatted,” let’s say more than 10 tattoos.

A year ago, their gait was different. They were walking with a confident stride. The liberal Obama presidency had filled them with the desire to be “bad girls,” to hoist a middle finger in the face of traditional, feminine beauty. CNN was promising a Hillary victory and a future that was female. The culture was deranged and they were enjoying their place atop of it.

But now we have the Trump presidency and the elegant femininity of Melania and Ivanka. The Trump women embody what men want: skinny frames, long hair, skin free of ink. They embrace male sexual desire, instead of repudiating it; in short, they’re a feminist nightmare.

ivanka-trump
This is what most men desire (sorry Andrea Dworkin)

There has been no Western society in the last 3,000 years that applauded the “beauty” of a woman covered in tattoos. These heavily-tatted women were banking on a trend that had no historical pedigree. They took the bait of their enemies, fellow women looking to remove competitors from the mating market. The heavily-tatted women played the useful idiot for their frenemies in the media. Now they’ll experience a sharp decline in their sexual market value, and their descent down the social ladder won’t be pretty.

Expect hysterics.

They’ll Become Self-Destructive

Cymbalta, alcoholism, multiple cat purchases…we can expect all of these things and more. Nearly a third of Western women are already mentally ill, and I predict that number will remain steady. Because these tattooed women are visibly marked, they won’t be able to escape from their bad life decisions. They’ll be like a person that parades around with a dunce cap, their stupidity on clear display.

Their bitterness  will be enhanced by the fact that many twenty-something girls WON’T be tattooed.

07_brazil_group_12
Would you rather have one of these, or a heavily tatted 40-year-old with a feminist chip on her shoulder? That’s what I thought…

Women are competitive, if nothing else. And there’s always a new batch on younger, hotter women on the horizon. When a forty-year old woman with 50 tattoos looks at a twenty-something with zero, you can expect the animosity to be extreme. These heavily tatted women will stumble back to their rooms, drowning their anger in red wine and Cymbalta.

Note: This anger will be magnified by their poor coping mechanisms. They grew up in the era of “girl power,” where a woman is never held accountable for her actions. Just take a look at Rhonda Rousey, the poster child for the chicks-with-dicks movement. Her comment after the loss to Holly Holm was telling: “I really do believe I’m still undefeated because being defeated is a choice. Everybody has losses in their life, but I choose to always be undefeated.”

Many modern women share Rosuey’s disconnect from reality – a fart is perfume, as long as they believe it is. Unfortunately, they won’t be able to shrug off their tattoos that easily. Expect hamster rationalization, followed by a descent into depression.

They Will Be Lower Wage Earners

As these tattooed women get older, they will probably be poor. Some service industry jobs have hired these people, true. However, there’s a big difference between being “allowed” to work somewhere and kicking ass in the financial sector. Today’s worker needs to shift between a variety of workplace scenarios, negotiating with people from all walks of life. Being heavily tatted will mitigate against these goals. You’re relegated to dealing with people who can accept you as opposed to being able to work with anyone.

bur20140911innovateink04
It will be harder for women like this to make good money in the future, which I think is great.

Another obstacle for heavily-tatted women will be their age. Remember that businesses are always looking to hire young, attractive people. Think of a typical restaurant owner, for example. He needs to maximize his profits. So why would he hire an old tattooed lady when he can hire a young woman without ink? He will do what’s best for his business, which means that he will hire people that are “clean looking.” This will work against the heavily tattooed woman, increasing the likelihood that she experiences poverty.

Poverty sucks, in many different ways. You can’t afford top-notch health insurance (or any insurance at all) which means you are more likely to receive substandard medical care. You cannot afford the best foods; this means you have to eat the GMO-laden crap that the food industry shills out to the masses. And you’re unable to  capitalize on all the niceties of life: vacations, reliable transportation, etc. This is the world that is facing many women that are heavily tattooed.

Conclusion

The culture war is real. We are about to experience the next wave of victims in the form of the heavily-tattooed woman. They are the latest group of useful idiots in the Cultural Marxist (oppressor versus oppressed) assault on America. The Cultural Marxists convinced these women that traditional America was “oppressing” them, and that they needed to fight back. These women took the bait and now they are inked for life – they took themselves “out of the game” so to speak. They are also beyond going to a tattoo removal facility; they have too many to remove, and attempting this would only make the situation worse.

Wars are fought with ideologies, in addition to weapons. The amount of Western women that have desecrated their bodies is a like the Battle of Verdun in this struggle. Thousands of casualties have been taken to fulfill the goals of the globalist elites, and the amount of anguish that will be created is substantial.

If nothing else, the next few years should be interesting…

Advertisements

Book Review: The Lessons of History by Will Durant

Book Review: The Lessons of History by Will Durant

Will Durant’s The Lessons of History is a magnificent book: clear, direct, and comprehensive in its assessment of world history. It’s one of those, “Why have I never read this before?” books. Durant provides an analysis of history that is devoid of political correctness. In short, it’s a history that people need to know.

Why have most people never heard of Will Durant? Very simple: he was not a Cultural Marxist. I’ve spoken before on the influence of Cultural Marxism in America,  and how it shoehorns the oppressor/oppressed model into every subject (with straight, white Europeans males being the oppressor). Durant is not part of the Frankfurt School in that regard.  He talks about a subject, like socialism for example, and examines it with a broad, comparative lense: using examples in China, Peru, Europe, etc. So we get an honest assessment of the topic, as opposed to a manipulative abuse of information.

300095-teacher-classroom
Frankfurt School example: “Yes, you are right children! America is the only country that ever practiced slavery!”

Here are a few takeaways from the book:

Equality Does Not Exist in Nature

According to Durant, equality is does not exist in nature; rather, it’s an enlightenment theory with no connection to the natural world:

Since Nature (here meaning total reality and its processes) has not read very carefully the American Declaration of Independence or the French Revolutionary Declaration of the Rights of Man, we are all born unfree and unequal: subject to our physical and psychological heredity, and to the customs and traditions of our group (p. 19-20).

Very true. All you need to do is watch “Animal Planet” to realize this. If animals were equal, they would all live to the same age, be born with the same strength, etc. But clearly they’re not. The Serengeti is horrifically discriminatory. It takes and gives life without empathy. The lion eats the gazelle, regardless if the gazelle deserved it or not.

deformed-cow
This cow was born equal. Except for the fact that it has another cow attached to it.

The same is true with humans of course. This is a topic I wrote about in a previous post, actually. Why are some children born with fatal heart conditions, while others live to be 100 and smoke? Why are some be born to be dwarfs, while others are 6’4? There is so much genetic inequality that it’s almost laughable to assert otherwise.

The Enforcement of Equalism in Humans Will Lead to Chaos

Durant believes that applying equalism to human interaction is a flawed idea.

For freedom and equality are sworn and everlasting enemies, and when one prevails the other die…only the man who is below the average in economic ability desires equality (p. 20)

In short, weak people like equality because it makes them stronger. I thought of feminism when I read this. Why was Andrea Dworkin—a hideous ham beast of a woman—so concerned with “equality”? It’s because her sexual market value was low. “Equality” meant that her sexual market value would rise, improving her rank within society.

andrea-dworkin
Dworkin wanted things to be more equal for women…gee, I wonder why?

This same kind of logic could be seen in the last election cycle. So many women with a low sexual market value wanted Hillary to win. Their logic could be summarized as this:

  • I’m a 5; Hillary Clinton is a 5. If she wins, now I’m a 10. That’s great!!
  • I’m a 5; Trump’s wife and daughters are a 10; if he wins, I’m a 5. Unacceptable!!

In short, “equality” is a way to make the weak strong and the strong weak. It’s a type of comminism, really.

Durant also points out that equalism can destroy an economy. For example, rich nations feel an obligation to take care of poor nations. But how long can the handout last?

The recent spectacle of Canada and the United States exporting millions of bushels of wheat while avoiding famine and pestilence at home seemed to provide a living answer to Malthus…this solution merely postpones the calamity. There is a limit to the fertility of the soil.

In short, the soil of a nation can only produce so much food; hopefully, just enough to feed its own nation. When it is required to feed other nations, then chaos eventually ensues. One can see an example of this in America’s constant desire to feed Africa. This has led to the denigration of our native soil, via an over-reliance on monoculture agriculture. It’s difficult enough to feed a nation of 310 million people. Having to feed the entire world will have a detrimental effect on America’s soil.

monokultura
Farmers working a double shift in Fresno to ship food to Uganda…for now.

The root cause of these problems, according to Durant, is a belief in equality:

“…the natural inequality of men soon re-creates an inequality of possessions and privileges, and raises to power a new minority with essentially the same instincts as in the old. The only real revolution is in the enlightenment of the mind and the improvement of character, the only real emancipation is individual, and the only real revolutionists are philosophers and saints.” (p. 72)

Equality can only last for so long. Eventually, the strong will rise and the weak will fall. All of the social engineering in the world cannot prevent the inevitable. I found his point here to be true. As much as I believe in charity, I find that it is often pointless. Very few people want to self-improve, strive for more, or be great. Most just want to exist.

Conclusion

Will Durant’s book is a must read. It’s a reminder that the liberal left has been “burning” books for many years now; not in a physical sense, of course. But they conveniently omit important works from the cannon. So most students will never get to read the work of Will Durant.

It’s time for us to re-educate ourselves; and The Lessons of History should be part of this re-education.

Book Review: Gorilla Mindset by Mike Cernovich

Book Review: Gorilla Mindset by Mike Cernovich

“We all start off as children with an abundance mindset and genuine fascination and curiosity about life. Somewhere along the way, it was lost. Mindset is a choice.” – Mike Cernovich 

I just finished Mike Cernovich’s excellent book, Gorilla Mindset. For those who don’t know, Mike has recently emerged as a philosophical powerhouse: self-improvement guru, political commentator, etc. I figured I would read his most popular book to get a better idea of who he is and what a “Gorilla Mindset” is.

Here are my takeaways…

His Advice is Practical

Mike covers a lot of ground in the book—everything from taking cold showers to stock market tips. The book is useful. It starts with the general, talking about the importance of your mindset. Then it moves into the specific, making this more than just a generic, self-help manual.

One nice piece of advice was on body posture. Mike argues that there is a link between body posture and personal success. At first it sounded corny, but I then did a mental rundown of the various people I know. Sure enough, the people I know that are successful have better posture: they walk more upright, hold their heads high, etc. Mike includes some personal photos in the book on how to improve your posture, which was a nice touch.

proper-posture
I was slouching when I read Mike’s chapter on good posture. But I quickly straightened up!

Another nice bit of practical advice was on diet. Needless to say, most Americans are looking to lose a few pounds (myself included). Mike is in pretty good shape, so his advice has some validity. He goes into detail about various types of foods, vitamins, exercise, etc. He even gives a recipe for making a kale shake, which I thought was helpful.

kale-smoothie
Mike gives us a Kale shake recipe…I am dusting off the blender as we speak.

Another concept I liked was “framing.” Mike discusses how mindset involves a reframing of various topics. He provides a real-world example of this, citing his experience as a lawyer:

When lawyers speak of framing, they are talking about the key issue or legal question that matters in a case. That is, what question do you ask a judge or jury to decide?

It’s important that Mike brings up his professional experience here. By doing this, he avoids the trap that many self-help books fall into; they become a series of platitudes, divorced from real-world examples.

His Style is Clear

Mike uses simple analogies and clear language to make his point. This is a sign of strength in my opinion. I despise the ambiguity of many “great” thinkers. The more incomprehensible they are, the more praise they receive from academia—Noam Chomsky, James Joyce, etc. Mike is able to avoid this trap.

Here is one of my favorite excerpts:

Imagine a computer. The monitor, keyboard, and processor are the hardware. Without any software to run it, your computer would be worthless. Your body is your hardware and your mindset is your operating system.

This is a good example of Mike’s writing style. He uses simple language, short sentence structures, and effective analogies. I’m sure he could use complex jargon if he wanted (he was a lawyer after all). But that would be defeat the point, and it would reach less people.

Note: the book, according to Mike’s Amazon page,  “Gorilla Mindset was the most successful non-fiction book launch of 2015, immediately hitting best-seller status.” So his writing style is working!

His Formatting is Effective

I like how Mike has centered and bold-texted information in the middle of the page. I don’t think I have seen this style before, but it works. It’s a nice way to laying out the important points in a clear way. I’ve noted that he also does this on his website, which works well.

Today’s writer is part content producer, part graphic designer. He has to make sure that the content is displayed in an aesthetically appealing way. Technical writers, for example, need to display information with a variety of visual aids: bold-text headings, photos, different colors, etc. They are writing to people than have a diminished attention span.

So the modern writer has to implement some effective formatting, but not TOO much. This is, after all, about the content. Mike’s layout is able to hit that sweet spot—enough formatting to illustrate the content well.

Conclusion

For me, the best part of the book was in Chapter 10. Mike describes a trip he took to the East Coast as a child, where he developed a passion to be rich. There is a great excerpt in that chapter:

“People ask me how they can find their life purpose or motivation. They don’t like my answer, but it’s the only one I’m capable of giving. If you feel unfulfilled, stop what you’re doing. Walk the streets until you’re exhausted. Repeat this everyday. When you finally see what you want, your life will change.”

As Mike points out, finding one’s passion is not easy. For many it is elusive, and they die without ever finding it. I have written about the same idea in a previous post. That being said, we have to commend somebody like Mike Cernovich. He is challenging people to become more, to do more, and to be more.

He’s challenging them to have a gorilla mindset.

To purchase Mike’s book, go to the following link: Gorilla Mindset.

You Either Have Ambition or You Don’t

You Either Have Ambition or You Don’t

It’s believed that women are more jealous than men. This is true in many regards, particularly when it comes to mating. However, men can be jealous in their own way. We see this jealousy in the professional world when a man achieves success. Very quickly, other men will come out of the woodwork to denigrate his existence. Anybody who has achieved success in a walk of life can attest to this.

Your success will bring you more detractors than your failure. And your success is directly tied to your ambition.

Ambition is Related to Your Faith in God

Your ambition is tied to your belief in God. You feel that God has gifted you with a tremendous power, and it’s imperative that you capitalize on it. You believe that you’re greatness is infinite in scope. So you get up every day, building a fire on the coals of self-confidence.

Conversely, a man’s lack of ambition is tied to his lack of faith; he’s not sure the world has any meaning. This atheism, or agnosticism, colors his daily affairs. It takes the wind out of his sails, making him do less, care less, and burn less.

A man without faith in God will never truly understand the hustle of an ambitious man.

Ambition Never Dies

The ambitious man is never finished. He is forever striving, whether he is 18 or 80. He believes there is still another page to be written in the history books and that it will contain his name. He doesn’t care that his name is Joe Smith and he lives in Nowhere, Nebraska. Those facts are irrelevant. He has a date with destiny.

Nietzsche said it best in Twilight of the Idols:

  • “A higher kind of human being, if I may say so, does not like ‘callings,’ precisely because he knows himself to be called. He has time, he takes time, he does not even think of ‘finishing’: at thirty one is, in the sense of high culture, a beginner, a child.”

Well put. The great man is always on the hustle. He burns with a passion which will only be extinguished when he is dead, when his last breath has left his body. Until that time, he’s forever burning with a restless energy—looking to do more, to be more, to care more.

The ambitious man is never finished in his quest.

Ambition is Hated by the Common Man

The ambitious man has enemies. These enemies will always try to minimize his plans, to denigrate his desires. You can almost hear them saying…

Who are you to want more? Who are you to dream big? Really, their questioning of you is a psychological projection. They doubt themselves.

Marianne Williamson said it well:

  • “We ask ourselves, Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us.”

The great challenge for the ambitious man will be overcoming these detractors. He will have to shrug them off with a courteous nod. He cannot let himself be sucked into the drain of low self-confidence. He has a higher calling that he must adhere to.

Can Ambition Be Cultivated?

This leads to the obvious question, “Can ambition be cultivated?” The Major seeks to help others, not to denigrate. I could make a Tony Robbins sermon and say that you merely need to “believe in yourself,” or some other feel-good platitude. But that won’t help.

The person without ambition needs a “breakthrough” moment. Something has to snap, the water has to tip over the levee. There has to come a “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore!” moment.

These breakthrough moments tend to be delivered by fate, as opposed to the advice of others. For example, somebody can tell you to be cautious about who you marry. But the pain of a divorce rape will be much more effective in waking somebody up.

So ambition can be cultivated…but it’s rare. It is usually the result of somebody being pushed over the edge, as opposed to somebody willfully seeking the goals of self-improvement. I’ve counseled many wayward people in my life, trying to point them into a positive direction. My counsel accomplished very little – 99% of them continued on their downward spiral.

The successful people I’ve met never needed my counsel. They came to the party ready to roll, so to speak. Their greatness occurred separate of me. Perhaps I gave them a helpful tip here or there. But by and large, they were self-contained individuals, burning with a passion to be great.

Conclusion

 

Ambition is central to all great men. And if you have ambition, you will find your circle of friends to be very small. That’s because others will try to take the wind out of your sails, to question your motivations, and to riddle you with doubt. So you must part ways with them, even though they might be excellent people in many ways.

A final thought by Oscar Wilde:

  • Our ambition should be to rule ourselves, the true kingdom for each one of us; and true progress is to know more, and be more, and to do more.

Three Ways to Fight Back Against Immoral, Left-Wing Teachers

Three Ways to Fight Back Against Immoral, Left-Wing Teachers

The college campus is ground zero when it comes to the SJW narrative. Most of my readers already know this. Sadly, the deviants have recently been doubling down on their behavior: they’ve gone from carrying a “rape mattress” on campus to putting tampons in the men’s bathroom.  The halls of academia are starting to resemble a freak show.

Sadly, the dysfunction is promoted by left-wing teachers. These teachers manipulate the students through a careful arrangement of activities and assignments. They corral the students to a “correct” answer—one that usually points a middle finger to conservative thought. If students try to disagree, many are punished with a lower grade. Subsequently, students are forced to shut up and watch the class become indoctrinated.

I taught at the college level for many years. My experience has shown me that a student should not protest in class, after class, or to the department chair. Remember that the far-left have control over all levels of higher education. If you challenge them, then you run the risk of having your GPA damaged. If you take your complaint to the department chair, you’ll find that she has a PHD in Women’s Studies and that she’s even worse than your teacher.

So you have to be smart. I recommend the following strategies for combatting the epidemic of left-wing teachers. I think these tactics can be effective on a small level. And if enough people do them, they can make a difference on a larger level.

Destroy the Teacher’s Reputation on Rate My Professor

Rate my Professor is an online site where students do what the title implies – they rate the performance of their professors. Many teachers rely on good feedback from this site to get future classes. Remember that most college instructors are part time, and that their jobs depend on future enrollment. If the teacher receives a flood of bad reviews on Rate My Professor, then the teacher’s class can be cancelled due to low enrollment. Years ago, a department chair informed me that I should be very mindful of my reviews on this site, since it correlated with his ability to assign me classes.

rmp
Students should be exposing left-wing bias on Rate My Professor

 

After your semester is over, I encourage you to go onto the site and post negative feedback about any SJW professors. If these teachers were particularly egregious in pushing their narrative, then you can post multiple comments. You’ll have to open a few burner accounts, but these can easily be deleted later. The point is that you’re hitting back, letting them know that you won’t tolerate an abuse of power.

Troll the Teacher’s YouTube Channel

Many instructors are now using YouTube to post informative videos. For example, it’s common for an English instructor to post information on how to write an essay, or a mathematics teacher to post some strategies on algebra. It’s almost become mandatory for instructors to have some sort of video component to their courses.

youtube
Many teachers have You Tube channels that can be trolled

I recommend that students troll the YouTube channel of their left-wing instructors. Postings should make the viewers aware that the teacher is a politically biased individual to be avoided. Also, you can add any other information that you feel is relevant: the teacher is late in grading papers, is prone to favoritism, etc.

Again, you can make several comments if you have a few burner accounts. I recommend that you space the postings out so that they don’t look suspicious (avoid five negative comments in one day, for example). The best time to troll the page is at the end of a semester. This is when students are most likely to provide their input on the course. The teacher will see that students are on to the game, and other students will be aware of it as well.

Note: If you have a teacher that scrubs the comments clean, then I encourage you to troll the department’s YouTube page: English, History, etc.

Word of Mouth

Word of mouth can also damage a teacher’s reputation. Although your audience is smaller than my previous two suggestions, it can actually be effective. That’s because young students will talk to one another about what teachers to take. This is especially true of female students who are more gossip oriented.

Note that word of mouth can also translate into a cold approach. For example, you can locate an attractive girl in the student cafeteria. Open her by stating that you are trying to pick out classes for the next semester, and that you’d like her advice on a specific teacher or class. Mention that you’ve had a bad experience with a recent teacher (insert SJW professor’s name) and that you want to avoid that scenario again. You don’t have to be specific about why you didn’t like the teacher—she will remember the teacher’s name, which is the important thing.

The bonus of course is that now you’ve opened her up. You can end the conversation by telling her to meet you at a popular event on the weekend, or asking her number. This could lead to a date and…hopefully, a bang. So you’ve “killed two birds with one.”

Conclusion

There is an old saying in football: “The best defense is a good offense.” If we can learn anything from SJW’s, it’s about the advantage of attacking. You catch the opposition off guard, forcing them into a careless mistake.

It’s time to reverse the trend. If a left-wing instructor has a weakness (especially a woman) then it’s hubris. The modern college is a tenured oligarchy, where dissenting voices are systematically removed. After time, they start to believe that the opposition does not exist. Given this reality, one can take pleasure in rattling their cages.

Academics are sacred. The longer that we let these rabble rousers pollute the halls of our noble universities, the more damaged our countries will become. It’s time to let them know that we see them, and we won’t accept their subversive Weltanschauung.

How I Restored My Foreskin

How I Restored My Foreskin

In December of 2005, I was speaking to a friend at a restaurant in Central America. He brought up the topic of circumcision and how it reduced the sexual pleasure in a man. I did not say anything, because I was unable to confirm or deny his statement. So I decided that I would return to the United States and do research on the topic.

In the meantime, I became very worried. Was it true? Was my penis desensitized?

The Internet was relatively new at that time. But still, there was a plethora of information on the topic of circumcision. Much of the information was conflicting. However, it was generally divided into two different opinions from men:

Pro Side

1.) Circumcised religious man, defending the process

2.) Circumcised secular American man, defending the process

3.) Man who was circumcised as an adult due to a tight foreskin, defending the process

Con Side

1.) Man who was circumcised as an adult because of social pressure, now bemoaning the loss of sensation

2.) Uncircumcised man (usually European) who could not believe anyone would want to cut their penis

My research led me to a theory; in a healthy man, circumcision leads to a loss of sexual pleasure.

Now what to do about it…I continued in my research until I found out about foreskin restoration. It sounded awkward and uncomfortable, but I decided to give it a try. What did I have to lose?

Step 1: Creating Loose Skin

Most American men have what is called a “tight” circumcision. That means there is little mobile skin on the penis. I was in that camp. So I used a film container, along with medical tape, to gently pull the shaft skin forward. It was an arduous process, often resulting in cuts and bruises. However, after several months I was able to loosen the skin a bit.

film
Insert your circumcised penis in a film container, stretch the skin forward, and tape it to the sides of the container.

Around two months in, something strange happened. I began to feel more sensation on my penis: a light tingling feeling. Masturbation was more pleasurable. I had the little “hint” I needed that my thesis was correct. I doubled down on my efforts and became more committed to restoring my foreskin.

Note: There is actually a scientific reason behind the change in sensation. When a man is circumcised, a layer of skin grows over the exposed penis to protect it (termed keratinization). When the penis is covered again, the dead skin falls off and exposes the nerves that had been buried underneath (referred to as dekeratinization).

Step 2: Use a TLC Tugger

Next, I bought a TLC Tugger; this was the most popular foreskin restoration device on the market. It was made by Ron Low, a man that’s a pioneer/advocate in the foreskin restoration field. He is to foreskin restoration what Steve Jobs is to the iPhone.

slider2-tlctugger_and_your-skin_cone-blue
The TLC Tugger…returning the circumcised man to a state of pleasure-filled glory!!!

The tugger is a clamp-style device that gently stretches the foreskin; it should be noted that what I was stretching was actually shaft skin, since there is no replacing the actual foreskin. The clamp is place on the penis, and then a strap goes around your leg (or over your shoulder). This causes a gentle pull on the shaft skin, moving it slowly forward. Note that skin is malleable; for example, you grow more skin when you gain weight. So conceptually, this same thing is being done to the shaft skin.

This process lasted for about two years. I just continued in my daily activities, leaving the TLC on to do its thing. I went to work, mailed the bills, did my laundry, etc. I tried to forget that I had a Medieval contraption hanging from my genitals. I quickly realized that if I concentrated on it that I would become overwhelmed with negative emotion. So I pushed that out of my mind and stayed committed to the goal.

My payday happened one day in 2007.  I was receiving oral sex from a girlfriend when lighting bolts went shooting through my body. Ding!!! Ding!! Ding!! Hello…what do we have here?

steam-out-my-ears-300x2581
Receiving my first blowjob with a newly restored foreskin.

I had reached the promised land: there was enough slack skin to roll over the newly sensitized penis. In short, my fake foreskin was recreating the job of an actual foreskin – a skin tube rolling over highly sensitized nerve endings. I was home!

From that day forward, it’s been Disneyland in my pants. Prior to my restoration, I had some great experiences – or so I thought. In hindsight, they were all experiences that centered around HER pleasure: “Boy, I really made her cum last night,” etc. But now there was a profound difference; the experiences I was having were mine. And they were damn good.

Ironically, the more pleasure I started having, the more that my partners began to have. They could sense my pleasure and this made them more excited. There is an interconnected aspect to sexual intercourse, and having genitals that function correctly is an integral part of this.

Step 3: Continue Manual Tugging

There was one drawback to the new foreskin. At times, it would not “hold” in place. This was often due to a change in weather. So I had to continually tug it back over the glans (head). This has become, even to this day, a kind of daily exercise.

As it turns out, there is a muscle in the foreskin that holds it in place. So when you restore your foreskin (which is essentially shaft skin) you do not have this muscle. So you periodically have to push your faux foreskin back into place. The solution is to do around 1,000 stretchces a day, or to periodically wear a band aid to keep the foreskin in place.

This photo provides a general idea of the goal:

foreskin-restoration
The science of foreskin restoration. Thank God for the internet.

Conclusion

Everyday, I thank God I was born in the this era. Thanks to the internet, I was able to improve my sexual experiences. I thought that sex was good before. Sure, it was good…but not like this. Now it is on another level entirely.

Before I was watching television in black and white; now it’s in technicolor.

 

SJW Version of “A Student’s Prayer” by St. Thomas Aquinas

SJW Version of “A Student’s Prayer” by St. Thomas Aquinas

Original prayer here: http://www.appleseeds.org/aquinas_stdpryr.htm

My Version

Come…

Creator of all carbon-based life forms,

true source of light and feminine wisdom,

origin of all non-binary entities,

graciously let a ray of your light penetrate (but only with written consent)

the darkness of a straight man’s understanding.

 

Take from me the double darkness (I apologize to my African-American friend)

in which I have been born to Caucasian privilege,

an obscurity of white male sin.

 

Give me understanding about the lesbian poetry of Adrienne Rich,

a retentive memory on European colonialism

and the ability to grasp things

that suit the teachings of Cultural Marxism

 

Grant me the talent (which men and women possess equally)

of being exact in my cuckolded explanations,

and the ability to express myself

with thoroughness to my bitter Women’s Studies professor.

 

Point out the beginning (which was probably a Female God)

direct the progress of my sexist fraternity brothers,

and help in the complete destruction of the United States of America

 

I ask this through the Prophet Mohammed, our Lord.