Thomas Sowell’s book, Basic Economics: A Citizen’s Guide to the Economy is just what the name implies—a beginner’s guide to economic theory. I found the book to be excellent. I should’ve read it years ago, since it would have peaked my interest in money matters a bit more.

Several quotes stood out:

Speculation is Superior to Gambling

Speculation is often misunderstood as being the same as gambling, when in fact it is the opposite of gambling.  What gambling involves, whether in games of chance or in actions like playing Russian roulette, is creating risk that would otherwise not exist, in order either to profit or to exhibit one’s skill or lack of fear.  What economic speculation involves is coping with an inherent risk in such a way as to minimize it and to leave it to be borne by whoever is best equipped to bear it.

Gambling is like marrying a woman that you’ve known for three months (something the Major has done). Essentially, you’re creating a risk. You’re making a commitment to somebody that’s a virtual stranger. You don’t have the all the information yet; in my case, I found out that my wife was an alcoholic.

We gamble out of stupidity; but also, it’s a “lack of fear” as Sowell points out. We test the natural laws of the universe, believing that our intuition is superior. Occasionally, we get lucky and win. But most of the time we lose.

Conversely, speculation is like marrying a woman that you’ve known for three years. You minimize a risk (AKA, speculate).  Her negative traits have already come to light, but you feel that you can manage them. You’ve seen the worst in her and feel that you can overcome the risk.

Smart people are speculators. They understand that risk is inherent in life, but they learn to manage it. Their good luck appears accidental to those around them: the product of a lucky break or even nepotism. But in reality, they calculated their decisions better. They like to skydive, but they also like parachutes.

The Federal Reserve Has Created More Problems than it Solved

The Federal Reserve system was established in 1914 as a result of fears of such economic consequences as deflation and bank failures.  Yet, the worst bank failures in the country’s history occurred after the Federal Reserve was established (p. 24)

Sowell brings up something that few Americans even question anymore—whether or not the Federal Reserve is a good thing. He believes that it was a bad thing. It’s interesting to note the creation of the Federal Reserve: 1914. This was, of course, at the start of World War 1. Obviously, there were concerns about political stability at the time.

Fifteen years later (1929), the stock market crashed and we had the Great Depression. The Federal Reserve was unable to stop the problem they said they would solve. We’ve had several economic downturns ever since: take 2008, for example, when the housing market collapsed.

It’s a powerful lesson—a time of crisis can lead to bad decision-making. And this bad decision can then become a way of life.

When You Help Someone Economically, You Often Hurt Another Person

Nothing is easier for the media or for politicians than to present “human interest” stories about someone whose family has been farming for generations and who has now been forced out of the kind of life they knew and loved by the impersonal economic forces of the marketplace.  What is forgotten is that these impersonal forces represent benefits to consumers who are just as much persons as the producers who have been arbitrarily selected as the focus of the discussion.  The temptation is always there to try to solve the problem of those whose plight has been singled out for attention, without regard for the effects elsewhere. (p. 27)

That’s the crux of charity: the natural Christian tendency to “help thy neighbor.” Sowell points out how the media will manipulate this altruistic desire, promoting a hard-luck story that’s designed to shift the government coffers in a different direction.

The appeal to pathos is ubiquitous. We saw it before the Affordable Care Act was passed (countless stories about a poor person who  could not afford medical care). Of course, moving money into someone’s pocket is often done by removing it from somebody else’s. This proved to be true with the ACA. The money that was used for people without health insurance was taken from another source – those who actually had insurance. This resulted in higher rates for those who were already covered.

Somebody always has to pay: the question is who.

Summary

Basic Economics is an excellent read. I think should be taught on the high school level; moreover, it would make a good read for Economics 101 courses at the college level. It explains the essential concepts with plain language, simple analogies, and logical organization.

I highly recommend the book.

See Related Article: Adam Smith on the Economic Differences Between Europe and Pre-Colombian America

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Book Review: Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell

  1. *jumping up and down* Still a jungle bunny! Still a google! Sowell! SOwell!

    *laughing and leaning back in relaxation, leg crossed in RL*

    Ah, Major. Your writing is as professional as it is accessible. All beginning bloggers (insulting term for a pro writer and his articles, but still) should look at them before plunging in. Damn good show.

    I wanted to mention something, an aside, an important note. For long periods of time I was separated from you. I was invisible to your world. There were times I neglected you in favor of Heartiste. For practical reasons — accessibility not being the least of them, respect for authority being important too — YOU ARE MORE IMPORTANT TO ME THAN LORD HEARTISTE.

    I chose Heartiste first because he thrums with power, crashing and smashing, and that’s a simple type of man to “read.” You are more subtle and sly, more dry and intellectual. In a word, you’re a library “stack” while Heartiste is a loud “boom box.” Major Styles, you can crack open a complex book on the beach and divine it the way a higher being would measure grains of sand on that same beach.

    Once again, I should be past the ignoring-you-stage. It almost seemed as if I was running for my life for a while, but I made it through the confetti and the seething mist. All will be well between us.

    And someday, I would bet, we shall meet.

      1. I believe, were I ever so lucky as to form an organization, you and Heartiste would have joint tasks from the same top ranks.

        Of course, my saying this sounds almost grandiose — but I insist, IF I EVER got enough money for an org, and decided to plunge in to work, the two of you would work by my side.

        At the very least, it seems like a shame that Great Men from Captain Capitalism (captaincapitalism.blogspot.ca) of Minnesota to Delicious Tacos of L.A. (delicioustacos.com) are not gathered together in one place.

        One of my higher talents is the spotting OF talent. I’d make an outstanding headhunter. It is a mark of this society’s mediocrity that it doesn’t scour the Internet for fine men and sharp thinkers with imagination.

        And you, Major Styles, are exactly on an even keel with the best. Or what is that level-checker that carpenters use, with the blobby, green floating liquid?

        You match them. Including your matching of Heartiste. I think his flash has dazzled me for a while too. Plus he has a huge audience, which is undoubtedly affecting.

        If you threw some firedust behind you, and spoke to tens of thousands, I’d probably be calling you the New Heartiste.

    1. “Major Styles, you can crack open a complex book on the beach and divine it the way a higher being would measure grains of sand on that same beach.”

      Much thanks. It is appreciated.

  2. Leave more comments at my site, Major! The Major’s views are inestimably valued, and Sorcerygod needs him as a friend besides!

    Just so you know, all references to women are being deleted, because they’ve been scaring off men. It’s the only possibility as to why my site is doing as poorly as it is. I refuse to believe I can get 240 new visitors to the Temple and three days later I’m down to zero. That’s just bullshit. I’m not THAT boring or stupid a writer and thinker. Hell I even have short stories.

    So to sum up: Dangerous Thoughts (DT) tm about women are going, and I NEED AND WANT YOUR COMMENTS.

    I shall continue to comment here, regardless of your decision. ~ S*Gd.

      1. Comments are the third-most important thing in my life right now.

        I’m counting on you, my Lord. Remember that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s