I’ve been to several Islamic countries: Morocco, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Palestine and Malaysia. In addition, I’ve traveled to many areas that have been hit by Islamic terrorism: i.e. Southern Thailand, the Philippines (Palawan), most of Europe, etc. Also, I’ve actually read the Koran. So while I’m not an expert, I know more about Islam than the average liberal Westerner.

My experience has taught me this; Most Middle Easterners are decent people and their food is very good: kabobs, hummus, etc. However, there is a very real problem with terrorism. Moreover, the Middle East is, by and large, a depressing shit hole. The famed Arab “hospitality” is virtually non-existent; if anything, the Westerner has to worry about continually being scammed or even attacked. Overall, it’s a place of poverty, genital mutilation, and despair.

cairo
You won’t find many left-wing hipsters in Cairo…

My perspective is very different from the Western liberal (the majority of which have never visited the Middle East or read the Koran). So that begs the question…why are liberals unable to acknowledge Islamic terrorism?

Let me give you the top three reasons:

Liberals Hate White People

Liberals have been trained since birth to hate white people. Kathy Griffin, for example, is a perfect example of how the “down-with-whitey” disease has metastasized. At the recent press conference, she offered the following reason for her decapitated head “joke.”

“I’ve been bullied by older, white men my whole life.”

What she really means is, “I’ve been ignored by older, white men my whole life.” But let’s hold off on the psychoanalysis for the moment (and we are analyzing a psycho, make  no mistake about it).

With her back against the wall, Griffin played the “old white man” card. She did this for one reason – she knows the Weltanschauung of the far left. Everything they believe is centered on a hatred of white men. So the left will overlook what is, essentially, an act of treason against the President. And they’ll repeat the well-worn excuse – the white man did it.

Liberals Believe in Rousseau’s Concept of the Noble Savage

Rousseau coined the term “noble savage.” It’s the idea that the brown peoples of the earth are an idyllic race – they live in harmony with the land, peacefully interacting with butterflies and baby deer. They hold hands and sing in unison. War, slavery, torture…all foreign concepts to them. Sadly, their utopia was overturned when the white Europeans arrived.

nsav
Rousseau was…well, misguided.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Pre-Colombian America, as well as tribal Africa, were home to innumerable atrocities. For example, roughly 1/3 of Oregonian Indians were slaves prior to the arrival of the Spanish. Another example can be found in The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano (1789), which provides an account of the Islamic slave trade in Western Africa: i.e. Equiano was stolen from his home by black slave traders, brought to the West African coast, and sold to Europeans.

There was nothing “noble” about Indians enslaving one another, or stealing African children from their beds in the middle of the night. Believing otherwise makes you intellectually inferior…not to mention a liar.

Liberals Don’t Travel to Islamic Countries

Most liberals are single/ugly women; the rest are young people (idealistic) or beta-male simps. These women present themselves as loving and accepting. In reality, they don’t want to visit – much less live in –  the Islamic countries of the world.

When was the last time you heard a liberal woman say, “I’m moving to Qatar!” Or how about, “I can’t wait to spend next summer in Algeria!” That’s a rhetorical question, of course. The answer is never. If they were so concerned about Muslims, then they would visit the Middle East. But they don’t have the courage to go there. So instead, they base their impressions on the small percentage of Muslims that have the money/education to live in the West – a minuscule sampling, at best.

lib meme
The meme that captures is well…

Remember: Liberal women only want to visit affluent areas. For example, look at how many movie stars talked about moving to Canada when Donald Trump won the presidency. Canada…not Bolivia, Senegal, or Mexico. So very brave! Taking a stand against injustice from an air-conditioned coffee house in Vancouver. Or contemplating the horrors of racism from a five-star restaurant in Montreal.

Summary

The Middle East has been going downhill since the 7th century (when Islam supplanted the local religions).  It’s now a region that’s dominated by stone-age thinking and brutal ideologies. And most urgently, the pestilence of terrorism.

Only a delusional person could ignore this fact…in other words, a Western liberal.

Advertisements

24 thoughts on “Why Liberals are Unable to Acknowledge Islamic Terrorism

  1. Good post as always, Mr. Major. Some thoughts:

    – The Koran is the central text of Islam but like Judaism (and unlike Christianity, generally speaking) it alone is not sufficient to understand the religion – Muslim clerics must also study the hadiths (sayings) and siras (biographies) of the Prophet Muhammed, of which there are many collections across the centuries, none conclusively authoritative. (Although some are considered moreso than others.) This is why it’s possible to read the Koran and conclude it’s a beautiful collection of poetry and that Islam is a religion of peace.

    – Speaking of, Islam never really claimed to be a religion of peace until Bush 43 did, other than (IIRC) a one-off Egyptian cleric in the 60s.

    – I’m not sure that’s quite what Rousseau wrote — he never used the term ‘noble savage’ — but the concept is still highly influential and what you write still stands. The underlying issue is that liberals tend to believe humans are inherently “good” (they deny original sin) and only culture and environment sways them towards civility or criminality. In other woods, put a third-worlder in the first-world and they will quickly conform to local customs. Which is a very false belief with disastrous consequences.

    – [I’ve written this elsewhere, apologies if you’re reading it again] My two sisters recently visited one of the more touristy, friendly ME countries (and comparatively more affluent, a point of yours). One sister is especially hard-left feminist and when I asked her how they were treated over there and what the men thought of feminism, she said they were very aggressive and forward with cat-calling, and “had no respect” for women’s rights. So I asked her, wouldn’t importing large quantities of folks from such a culture be a detriment to the feminist cause? wouldn’t this largely incompatible culture have a ripple effect on our own culture? She seemed stumped for a moment, then says, “V, men catcall here.” All I can say is, LOL… and smh, GE-style.

    – The other sister, similar in mindset, was pretty disturbed when I told her that while Islam may frown on raping/assaulting non-Muslims, it’s considered far less of an offence than against Muslim women. I compared this to the closest Biblical OT laws, about the widows of conquered enemies and how if Israelite men were interested, they had to allow a month for grieving and then the only option was marriage, without possibility of divorce. Still backward from a modern perspective but very progressive compared to contemporary standards, which was typically untrue of Islam (with perhaps some exceptions).

    1. “The Koran is the central text of Islam but like Judaism (and unlike Christianity, generally speaking) it alone is not sufficient to understand the religion – Muslim clerics must also study the hadiths (sayings) and siras (biographies) of the Prophet Muhammed, of which there are many collections across the centuries, none conclusively authoritative.”

      Interesting. Thank you for the added insight, V. I will have to look into this more.

    2. “In other woods, put a third-worlder in the first-world and they will quickly conform to local customs. Which is a very false belief with disastrous consequences.”

      The people of Minnesota (AKA, Little Somalia) would agree.

      1. Once upon a time that was largely true. It began to end in the late ’50s and ’60s as an unintended consequence of what is laughably called the Civil Rights Movement. Since then, we’ve move from “melting pot” to “salad bar” or “cafeteria,” with assimilation being denigrated and denounced.

      2. True. Previous attempts to blend in are largely being shucked off.

        I know a Mexican gal who spouts things like “This is our country!” on her social media feed. So much for blending in.

    3. “In other woods, put a third-worlder in the first-world and they will quickly conform to local customs. Which is a very false belief with disastrous consequences.”

      It’s unfortunate when our family members fall under the spell. I have a cousin (normally nice guy) who has become unhinged by the Trump ascendancy. He recently went to a Women’s Roller Derby Conference (yes, he’s really that bad) and sent the entire family an email about the event.

  2. An outstanding post Ron, politically incorrect of course, but one that I unreservedly applaud. There is a slow, very slow, change in attitudes in the UK at the moment after two terrorist attacks in a week. Strong statement from the PM, changes in police procedures and ……. ordinary people attacking the terrorists as an incident occurred. I hope you will be ok with me reblogging this in a few days provided I haven’t moved to the US after our General Election on Thursday!

  3. Reblogged this on Tales of Mindful Travel and commented:
    The blog Major Styles today provides a window into the mindset of left wing cultural Marxists and their infantile perception of Islamic terrorism. When mixed with a feminist agenda these people are a danger to democracy worldwide, and Major Styles provides a valuable service by writing about something the main stream media ignore or hide.

      1. Thanks Ron. I’ve just been chatting to a young female friend in Nepal who have close worker links with Qatar. She doesn’t understand the terrorist threat and is very confused and scared. Do these left wing shits understand just what effect they are having around the world?

      2. Dr., the Muslim terrorists could blow up all of Europe and the libs would still find a way to blame it on the heterosexual, white male privilege of Sir Walter Raleigh.

  4. Finally! Getting the comments you deserve richly.

    Best line (very basic, but gravid with truth):

    “Most liberals are single/ugly women; the rest are young people (idealistic) or beta-male simps.”

    I don’t care about Muslims — they’re neutered by their garbage mindsets from the start. I DO care about liberals, who are occupying my throne. I don’t like them because I’d like to be where they are.

    The liberals are as you describe them to a tee. And yet they rule stronger men who could smash them down so easily. The mind is the ultimate tool — that, and social organization.

    1. Sorcery, I don’t write about Islam a lot, simply because many other writers do a good job in that regard. However, I thought it was time for me to throw my two cents in. And as you rightfully state, a garbage mindset at best. A roaming band of murderous heathens at worst. The obvious must be noted and stated.

      The liberals, as you point out, as perhaps more dangerous. They are the ones enabling and allowing this lawlessness to continue.

      1. I believe there’s a whole series of articles to be written on WHY the liberals run the show (partially).

  5. Would it be OK if I cross-posted this article to WriterBeat.com? I’ll be sure to give you complete credit as the author. There is no fee, I’m simply trying to add more content diversity for our community and I liked what you wrote. If “OK” hplease let me know via email.

    Autumn
    AutumnCote@WriterBeat.com

  6. Reblogged this on John Liming.Blog and commented:
    I have talked at length on my blog about the idiocy of some mindless creatures I often call “Radical Islamist Apologists” — usually ugly white Left-Wing women who have never been to the Middle east or a few rickety old nearly-mentally defunct academics with time on their hands.

    It has taken a long time for any American who grovels at the asshole of political correctness to get the courage to speak the words, “Radical Islamic Terrorism” when discussing the latest tragic terrorism attacks around the globe and I think I found an article on the Internet (In my WordPress.Com ‘Reader’ to be exact) that details the problem of the tongue-tied modern American Left-Leaning Libtard in as lucid a fashion as I believe I have ever read:

    Excerpt:

    “…The Middle East has been going downhill since the 7th century (when Islam supplanted the local religions).  It’s now a region that’s dominated by stone-age thinking and brutal ideologies. And most urgently, the pestilence of terrorism.
    Only a delusional person could ignore this fact…in other words, a Western liberal…”
    Now take a minute and read the whole article: 

      1. I do agree John. You would think that repeated acts of Islamic violence would wake liberal Westerners up…but it doesn’t seem to pierce their cognitive dissonance.

      2. I have never heard truth spoken so eloquently, Major and thanks for sharing it with the world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s